Update: 2.6.30 kernel is in xorg-edgers now

[cworth.org] / src / intel / driver_stability.mdwn

diff --git a/src/intel/driver_stability.mdwn b/src/intel/driver_stability.mdwn
index 70da02fa33683636153ecb28e1d58817256c0c84..7cde914d750888659a451c053266d73d34298759 100644 (file)
--- a/src/intel/driver_stability.mdwn
+++ b/src/intel/driver_stability.mdwn
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ In the meantime, however, it's also obvious that some users are not
 happy with the driver, and some have gotten the impression that the
 quality is getting consistently worse with time. Some have theorized
 that no quality-assurance testing is happening, or that the developers
-just plain don't care about regressions. Neither of those theories or
+just plain don't care about regressions. Neither of those theories are
 true, so why is there such a disconnect between the developers and the
 users?
 
@@ -63,7 +63,9 @@ repository of packages named
 [xorg-edgers](https://launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers) where users can
 easily get packages built directly from git. I don't think it includes
 the kernel yet, as it will soon hopefully, but this is definitely a
-step in the right direction.
+step in the right direction. *Update*: It does include a 2.6.30 kernel
+now---maybe all that time I spent writing this blog post wasn't wasted
+after all.
 
 But what about the users that _did_ upgrade their kernel and driver
 and are _still_ seeing some major problems? In this case, we really