thread->authors_array = NULL;
g_ptr_array_free (thread->matched_authors_array, true);
thread->matched_authors_array = NULL;
+
+ if (!thread->authors)
+ thread->authors = talloc_strdup(thread, "");
}
/* clean up the ugly "Lastname, Firstname" format that some mail systems
static void
_resolve_thread_relationships (notmuch_thread_t *thread)
{
- notmuch_message_node_t *node;
+ notmuch_message_node_t *node, *first_node;
notmuch_message_t *message, *parent;
const char *in_reply_to;
- for (node = thread->message_list->head; node; node = node->next) {
+ first_node = thread->message_list->head;
+ if (! first_node)
+ return;
+
+ for (node = first_node->next; node; node = node->next) {
message = node->message;
in_reply_to = _notmuch_message_get_in_reply_to (message);
if (in_reply_to && strlen (in_reply_to) &&
_notmuch_message_list_add_message (thread->toplevel_list, message);
}
+ /*
+ * if we reach the end of the list without finding a top-level
+ * message, that means the thread is a cycle (or set of cycles)
+ * and any message can be considered top-level. Choose the oldest
+ * message, which happens to be first in our list.
+ */
+ if (first_node) {
+ message = first_node->message;
+ in_reply_to = _notmuch_message_get_in_reply_to (message);
+ if (thread->toplevel_list->head &&
+ in_reply_to && strlen (in_reply_to) &&
+ g_hash_table_lookup_extended (thread->message_hash,
+ in_reply_to, NULL,
+ (void **) &parent))
+ _notmuch_message_add_reply (parent, message);
+ else
+ _notmuch_message_list_add_message (thread->toplevel_list, message);
+ }
+
/* XXX: After scanning through the entire list looking for parents
* via "In-Reply-To", we should do a second pass that looks at the
* list of messages IDs in the "References" header instead. (And