X-Git-Url: https://git.cworth.org/git?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fexa%2Fi965%2Femulating_speedups.mdwn;h=b9b36d198e602cdb5a281d4a9849c4542aa0ada3;hb=0f9a6774849d9826b5feae2c0ba5f23ffc3f9886;hp=7370a55ad37355ca7a11bdd98e3da35433f16e88;hpb=27e889ea6e83a2242e8d4e31a7fe163edf50fd41;p=cworth.org

diff --git a/src/exa/i965/emulating_speedups.mdwn b/src/exa/i965/emulating_speedups.mdwn
index 7370a55..b9b36d1 100644
--- a/src/exa/i965/emulating_speedups.mdwn
+++ b/src/exa/i965/emulating_speedups.mdwn
@@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ in the i965 driver, then I
 result of this experiment is that the X server will still go through
 the EXA paths, but will basically use all the same software-fallbacks
 for compositing that are used in the case of NoAccel. The performance
-with this patch can be compared to the NoAccel case here.
+with this patch can be compared to the NoAccel case here. (Again,
+click through to my blog if you're just getting a list of numbers, not
+a colorful bar chart.)
 
 <dl class="chart barchart">
     <dt><a href="/exa/i965/emulating_speedups/NoAccel/system.oprofile">NoAccel</a> (<a href="/exa/i965/emulating_speedups/NoAccel/timing">14.4 ms.</a>) <a href="/exa/i965/emulating_speedups/NoAccel/system.symbols">symbols profile</a></dt>