X-Git-Url: https://git.cworth.org/git?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fexa%2Fi965%2Frender_bench.mdwn;h=8fb2fe107b774d7df282c93da7bc4a302db74f59;hb=5c014fe14d7a114dc525711d3236feb10f27177f;hp=00736c9f627d9b6e1506a4ee0833709f81247cab;hpb=c476c4b570c580f947f18ec8c277d604e91bc6a1;p=cworth.org

diff --git a/src/exa/i965/render_bench.mdwn b/src/exa/i965/render_bench.mdwn
index 00736c9..8fb2fe1 100644
--- a/src/exa/i965/render_bench.mdwn
+++ b/src/exa/i965/render_bench.mdwn
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-[[meta title="Running render_bench against EXA/i965"]]
+[[!meta title="Running render_bench against EXA/i965"]]
 
-[[tag exa performance xorg i965]]
+[[!tag exa performance xorg i965]]
 
 Earlier this month I attended the X Developers' Summit in Cambridge,
 UK (not the Cambridge near Boston, USA). We stayed at Clare College
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ I hadn't run `render_bench` since I started playing with EXA and the
 i965 chip, so it was definitely a worthwhile thing to do. Here are the
 results I got (comparing XAA and EXA both against imlib2):
 
-[[img render_bench-offscreen.png]]
+[[!img render_bench-offscreen.png]]
 
 All of the numbers are from the same 2.13GHz dual-core Intel
 machine. But the absolute numbers aren't interesting anyway. The
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ than imlib2 to 1.3-12.9 times faster. Anyone interested in the raw
 times can view the [EXA
 log](http://cworth.org/exa/i965/render_bench/render_bench-exa.log) and
 [XAA
-log](http://cworth.org/exa/i965/render_bench/render_bench-exa.log)
+log](http://cworth.org/exa/i965/render_bench/render_bench-xaa.log)
 files.
 
 One thing that would be useful is for someone to augment the framework