X-Git-Url: https://git.cworth.org/git?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fexa%2Fmozilla_i965_profiles.mdwn;h=98cd7513a852c2b99f73056c0c89d50a7d914142;hb=dea5bca3d4a058e4af22eb8cf5e48d344c103101;hp=4f61d5b3fc5a18008fa66396d7617d3b0c11dcbd;hpb=7c92a95f5ba2ad1d0e23e9cb5f00983061e108fa;p=cworth.org

diff --git a/src/exa/mozilla_i965_profiles.mdwn b/src/exa/mozilla_i965_profiles.mdwn
index 4f61d5b..98cd751 100644
--- a/src/exa/mozilla_i965_profiles.mdwn
+++ b/src/exa/mozilla_i965_profiles.mdwn
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-[[meta title="Profiles for Mozilla Trender on i965"]]
+[[!meta title="Profiles for Mozilla Trender on i965"]]
 
-[[tag exa performance xorg]]
+[[!tag exa performance xorg]]
 
 
 I recently [[posted|mozilla_trender]] results showing EXA (and XAA)
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ reason?
 And here with EXA we see some good, and some really bad. The good news
 is that the pixman functions doing software compositing have
 disappeared from the top of the profile, leaving only software
-rasterization. But what's with this new i965_prepare_composite
+rasterization. But what's with this new `i965_prepare_composite`
 function that's taking even more time than all of libxul? That seems
 like rather excessive overhead.