X-Git-Url: https://git.cworth.org/git?a=blobdiff_plain;f=src%2Fglucose%2Fi965%2Ffirst_look.mdwn;h=6aeac4ccfc5af9dae8ea30f017256174fcd21aa7;hb=5c014fe14d7a114dc525711d3236feb10f27177f;hp=c1c54ab0fc2fc87d389ca60d7daf90be93bbf5e9;hpb=9627548cd8e570faa16b2755bf5a65bb1df86ec0;p=cworth.org

diff --git a/src/glucose/i965/first_look.mdwn b/src/glucose/i965/first_look.mdwn
index c1c54ab..6aeac4c 100644
--- a/src/glucose/i965/first_look.mdwn
+++ b/src/glucose/i965/first_look.mdwn
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-[[meta title="A first look at Glucose on the i965"]]
+[[!meta title="A first look at Glucose on the i965"]]
 
-[[tag xorg exa performance i965]]
+[[!tag xorg exa performance i965]]
 
 As readers of my blog know, I've been working on improving the Intel
 965 driver within the [EXA](http://cworth.org/tag/exa/) acceleration
@@ -22,18 +22,20 @@ instructions](http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/Glucose).
 I've followed those instructions and run a benchmark comparing Glucose
 and EXA. The benchmark I chose is the expedite application that comes
 with evas, (thanks to the people that kindly pointed out this newer
-benchmark to me after m recent
+benchmark to me after my recent
 [explorations](http://cworth.org/exa/i965/render_bench/) with the
-older render_bench). To get expedite you'll need the e17/libs/evas and
+older evas benchmarks). To get expedite you'll need the e17/libs/evas and
 e17/apps/expedite modules from [enlightenment
 CVS](http://enlightenment.org/p.php?p=download/cvs&l=en).
 
 Expedite is a nice benchmark in that it separates things like image
-blending and text rendering into separate tests, (unlike
-render_bench). It's also nice that evas includes many backends which
-can be interesting for comparison, (though I won't be looking at
-anything but its XRender-based backends here---and it looks like evas'
-cairo and OpenGL backends are not currently functional).
+blending and text rendering into separate tests, (unlike the older
+evas benchmark). It's also nice that evas includes many backends which
+can be interesting for comparison. But I won't be looking at anything
+but its XRender-based backends here---and it looks like evas' cairo
+and OpenGL backends are not currently functional. They are disabled by
+default, and when I enabled them I ran into compilation problems, (I
+suspect neglect and bit rot).
 
 So here are the results I got for three acceleration architectures:
 
@@ -48,7 +50,7 @@ So here are the results I got for three acceleration architectures:
 The results are all normalized to the performance of our baseline,
 XAA. And larger numbers are better.
 
-[[img expedite.png]]
+[[!img expedite.png]]
 
 The [raw
 data](http://cworth.org/glucose/i965/first_look/expedite.data) is also