From 55a78d5dbd96b80939458d9d6cc8a536b1befa87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:11:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] test: Use increment_mtime rather than sleep

The sleep was to force the directory's mtime to advance between the
previous notmuch new and the subsequent rm;notmuch new.

The current convention is to use the existing increment_mtime function
for this purpose, (which avoids the test suite being slowed down by
calls to sleep).

Thanks to Austin Clements for noticing this undesired sleep.
---
 test/search-folder-coherence | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/search-folder-coherence b/test/search-folder-coherence
index cf3ba40d..9c312542 100755
--- a/test/search-folder-coherence
+++ b/test/search-folder-coherence
@@ -34,10 +34,9 @@ test_begin_subtest "Test matches folder:spam"
 output=$(notmuch search folder:spam)
 test_expect_equal "$output" "thread:0000000000000001   2001-01-05 [1/1] Notmuch Test Suite; Test message #1 (inbox unread)"
 
-sleep 1;
-
 test_begin_subtest "Remove folder:spam copy of email"
 rm $dir/spam/$(basename $file_x)
+increment_mtime $dir/spam
 output=$(NOTMUCH_NEW)
 test_expect_equal "$output" "No new mail. Detected 1 file rename."
 
-- 
2.45.2