Clarify some things pointed out by Vincent Torri

diff --git a/src/glucose/i965/first_look.mdwn b/src/glucose/i965/first_look.mdwn
index c1c54ab0fc2fc87d389ca60d7daf90be93bbf5e9..a02187bcfb9fe2ff66207f5ab11b043b4c81bb54 100644 (file)
--- a/src/glucose/i965/first_look.mdwn
+++ b/src/glucose/i965/first_look.mdwn
@@ -22,18 +22,20 @@ instructions](http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/Glucose).
 I've followed those instructions and run a benchmark comparing Glucose
 and EXA. The benchmark I chose is the expedite application that comes
 with evas, (thanks to the people that kindly pointed out this newer
-benchmark to me after m recent
+benchmark to me after my recent
 [explorations](http://cworth.org/exa/i965/render_bench/) with the
-older render_bench). To get expedite you'll need the e17/libs/evas and
+older evas benchmarks). To get expedite you'll need the e17/libs/evas and
 e17/apps/expedite modules from [enlightenment
 CVS](http://enlightenment.org/p.php?p=download/cvs&l=en).
 
 Expedite is a nice benchmark in that it separates things like image
-blending and text rendering into separate tests, (unlike
-render_bench). It's also nice that evas includes many backends which
-can be interesting for comparison, (though I won't be looking at
-anything but its XRender-based backends here---and it looks like evas'
-cairo and OpenGL backends are not currently functional).
+blending and text rendering into separate tests, (unlike the older
+evas benchmark). It's also nice that evas includes many backends which
+can be interesting for comparison. But I won't be looking at anything
+but its XRender-based backends here---and it looks like evas' cairo
+and OpenGL backends are not currently functional. They are disabled by
+default, and when I enabled them I ran into compilation problems, (I
+suspect neglect and bit rot).
 
 So here are the results I got for three acceleration architectures: