-[[meta title="Correcting bugs in the rectangles test"]]
+[[!meta title="Correcting bugs in the rectangles test"]]
-[[tag cairo exa performance xorg]]
+[[!tag cairo exa performance xorg]]
-Owen Taylor was kind enough to take a close look at my [[recent
+Owen Taylor was kind enough to take a close look at my [[!recent
post|understanding_rectangles]] comparing the performance of EXA and
NoAccel rectangle fills on an r100. He was also careful enough to
notice that the results looked really fishy.
results do appear to have the correct trend as can be seen from these
two graphs showing the measured fill rates:
-[[img fill-rates-cairo-perf.png]]
+[[!img fill-rates-cairo-perf.png]]
-[[img fill-rates-x11perf.png]]
+[[!img fill-rates-x11perf.png]]
But again, notice from the Y-axis values of the cairo-perf plot that
the numbers are just plain too large to be believed.