Add note about bar chart being available on the blog.

[cworth.org] / src / exa / i965 / emulating_speedups.mdwn

diff --git a/src/exa/i965/emulating_speedups.mdwn b/src/exa/i965/emulating_speedups.mdwn
index 7370a55ad37355ca7a11bdd98e3da35433f16e88..b9b36d198e602cdb5a281d4a9849c4542aa0ada3 100644 (file)
--- a/src/exa/i965/emulating_speedups.mdwn
+++ b/src/exa/i965/emulating_speedups.mdwn
@@ -23,7 +23,9 @@ in the i965 driver, then I
 result of this experiment is that the X server will still go through
 the EXA paths, but will basically use all the same software-fallbacks
 for compositing that are used in the case of NoAccel. The performance
-with this patch can be compared to the NoAccel case here.
+with this patch can be compared to the NoAccel case here. (Again,
+click through to my blog if you're just getting a list of numbers, not
+a colorful bar chart.)
 
 <dl class="chart barchart">
     <dt><a href="/exa/i965/emulating_speedups/NoAccel/system.oprofile">NoAccel</a> (<a href="/exa/i965/emulating_speedups/NoAccel/timing">14.4 ms.</a>) <a href="/exa/i965/emulating_speedups/NoAccel/system.symbols">symbols profile</a></dt>