Add new intel tag

[cworth.org] / src / exa / i965 / new_job_old_tricks.mdwn

diff --git a/src/exa/i965/new_job_old_tricks.mdwn b/src/exa/i965/new_job_old_tricks.mdwn
index f320434702f52888885710d6cfd39b90813ea88d..03a07b25c5566773ca56695a9c3ab58a2de1bba7 100644 (file)
--- a/src/exa/i965/new_job_old_tricks.mdwn
+++ b/src/exa/i965/new_job_old_tricks.mdwn
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-[[meta title="A new job, but old performance fixes"]]
+[[!meta title="A new job, but old performance fixes"]]
 
-[[tag exa performance i965]]
+[[!tag exa performance intel i965]]
 
 Many readers have heard already, but it will be news to some that I
 recently changed jobs. After just short of 4 years with Red Hat, I've
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ So, with that in place the only thing left to decide was how large of
 a vertex buffer to allocate upfront. And that gives me an excuse to
 put in a performance plot:
 
-[[img vertex_buffers.png]]
+[[!img vertex_buffers.png]]
 
 So the more the better, (obviously), until we get to 256 composite
 operations fitting into a single buffer. Then we start losing