The current scheme of choosing the replyto (i.e. the default parent
for threading purposes) does not work well for mailers that put
the oldest Reference last.
EOF
test_expect_equal_file EXPECTED OUTPUT
EOF
test_expect_equal_file EXPECTED OUTPUT
+test_begin_subtest "trusting reply-to (tree view)"
+test_subtest_known_broken
+test_emacs '(notmuch-tree "id:B00-root@example.org")
+ (notmuch-test-wait)
+ (test-output)
+ (delete-other-windows)'
+cat <<EOF > EXPECTED
+ 2016-06-17 Alice ┬►root message (inbox unread)
+ 2016-06-18 Alice ╰┬►child message (inbox unread)
+ 2016-06-18 Alice ╰─►grand-child message (inbox unread)
+End of search results.
+EOF
+test_expect_equal_file EXPECTED OUTPUT
+
--- /dev/null
+From: Alice <alice@example.org>
+To: Daniel <daniel@example.org>
+Subject: child message
+Message-ID: <B01-child@example.org>
+In-Reply-To: <B00-root@example.org>
+References: <B00--root@example.org>
+Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:14:41 -0400
+
+This is a normal-ish reply, and has both a references header and an
+in-reply-to header.
+
--- /dev/null
+From: Alice <alice@example.org>
+To: Daniel <daniel@example.org>
+Subject: grand-child message
+Message-ID: <B01-grand-child@example.org>
+In-Reply-To: <B01-child@example.org>
+References: <B01-child@example.org> <B00-root@example.org>
+Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:24:41 -0400
+
+This has the references headers in the wrong order, with oldest first.
+Debbugs does this.
--- /dev/null
+From: Alice <alice@example.org>
+To: Daniel <daniel@example.org>
+Subject: root message
+Message-ID: <B00-root@example.org>
+Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 22:14:41 -0400
+
+This message has no reply-to